Date Published 10 Mar 2021
Read Time 10 minutes

Inside dynamic brands: 5 ways to design dynamism

Words by Jeffrey Effendi

When it comes to brand identities, you’re probably incredibly familiar with the iconic logos that have shaped the industry since the early 1950s: the Nike Swoosh, FedEx’s arrow and the I Love NY logo, just to name a few.

These are examples of what we would conventionally label as “static brand identities” (at least in their original iteration) — a structured visual system of logo, colour palette, typefaces and styling guidelines which work together to effectively communicate the ethos, mission and identity of a company.

What you might not be as familiar with is the interesting and exciting new approach that has been stirring things up in the branding world,“dynamic brand identities”. This new approach has been introduced in recent years and it has been explored and explained in great detail by Irene Van Nes in her book “Dynamic Identities: How to Create a Living Brand”. In a nutshell, a dynamic identity is a visual system that pushes the boundaries of the traditional static logo design we’re so familiar with, instead opting for logo systems with a higher level of adaptability, flexibility and personalisation. The brandmark itself becomes a visual element capable of evolving and adapting to respond to changing variables, situations and social contexts. The result, a visually cohesive and highly expressive set of mark variations. Pretty cool, huh?

Why dynamic identities and why now?

A variety of factors have been contributing to the rise of dynamic brands. From the need for flexible digital application of brand identities across multiple devices and screen sizes, to the latest developments in the way we interact with the world and other humans around us — still following? Allow me to explain.

In recent years, society has gradually shifted to a model strongly focused on the individual, placing personal experiences before collective ones. These days people don’t want an app or service to simply provide them with useful albeit generic content, they  crave more — they want their content curated and tailored to them as individuals with unique needs and preferences.

This is not to say that a deep sense of community and pop-culture are irrelevant in the modern world, but simply that if a brand identity ignores this societal shift it may well struggle to communicate the values and aims of a company effectively. I believe as individuals see and experience contexts and objects disparatively, it makes sense for brand identities to be able to flex and adapt to our fluid, modern world.

No one size fits all

As I mentioned earlier, when it comes to dynamic brand identities it’s important they are “adaptable, fluid, evolving, growing, and customisable”, so it’s not hard to imagine why there are many different methods you could use when designing an effective dynamic brand. Here’s a quick overview of the main ones …

1. Formulaic

This is the simplest strategy for designing a dynamic brand. A sub-brand is generated from a parent logo by adding an extra element or tagline. Colour is added by applying a colour coding convention, which is usually guided by the wider colour palette guidelines of the parent brand. The base, structural brand mark usually remains unaltered, serving as a unifying element across the dynamic identities.

The formulaic approach proves itself to be very useful and appropriate when creating a dynamic identity of say, a product offering or different branches of an organisation. Below are some handy examples of the formulaic approach in action.

Martin by Born and Raised

New Museum by Wolf Ollins

2. Container

This is another fairly straightforward strategy for creating dynamic brand identities. In this case, sub-brands are created by adding bespoke graphics to a parent logo. The parent logo acts as a unifying device, a container that carries the differentiation of the sub-brand. The bespoke graphics can be patterns, vectors or photographic imagery and anything that can convey the different aspects living within the parent brand. This Container approach to dynamic branding appears to lend itself especially well for Museums and Art Institutes, examples of which you can see below.

Cambridge Elements by Branch

Actionable by Underline Studio

3. Permutations from base geometries

This approach sees the generation of sub-brands using bespoke graphics derived from a parent logos base geometries. The resulting visuals that make up the dynamic identity usually depict different attributes of the parent brand, or may represent sub-units of the global object or organisation. Below, are some great examples to show you what I mean.

ZenDesk by Zendesk in-house team

Bloomsbury Research Institute by Mike Scott

The Present Group by Lauren Venell

Meteorologisk Institutt by Neue

4. Grid-based customisations

This is a more articulate, specific strategy for creating a dynamic brand identity. In this case, a sub-brand is generated from a parent logo using a base grid. This grid is drawn or traced over for each sub-brand and the ways this is carried out, usually represents the variety of elements which are contained within the parent group. Below are some examples of this done really well.

Bordeaux Metropole by Ruedi Baur


5. Variable-based customisations

The final approach I will cover here, variable-based customisation, represents a higher level of brand identity customisation. A sub-brand is generated from a parent logo through the distortion of shapes and/or variations of the parent logo. These variations and shapes are guided by parameters strongly linked with individual or unique aspects of say, a product or values of a company. Check out these great examples of this below.

Sydney Dogs and Cats home by For the People

Nordkyn by Neue

BroadGate by DN&Co

Is dynamic branding right for you?

I believe the correct answer here is “maybe”. While it’s always exciting  and ‘oh-so-tempting’ to jump onboard with the latest trends, in this case you should resist the urge and take a minute ask yourself: is dynamic branding really right for me?

Dynamic branding should not be used for the sole objective of standing out from your competition by being trendy and visually eclectic — it should instead be used with careful consideration, and only as a visual formula to benefit a real-world requirement.

While every project is different and careful consideration should be given on a project-by-project basis, a good rule of thumb when deciding whether to choose dynamic branding is to explore it only if it reflects a core attribute of the company it represents. This concept is further explained in this article here “The Future is Fluid: Inside Dynamic logos”, published on Hexanine:

“This way of thinking about identity design only works when it’s an outgrowth of the brand’s distinctive DNA – some essential characteristic of the company or organization, whether it’s the nature of change, the style of a building, or illustrating the whimsy needed to play in a specific industry. Some brands might need to show diversity of service or product, while others see flexibility as a crucial competitive advantage, and other organizations have evolution written into their foundations.”

Still unsure if dynamic branding would suit your needs? Here at DrawHistory, we can help you figure it all out. Our team can take you on an engaging and rewarding journey, from initial discovery workshops and key brand ingredients to a polished identity you can truly call your own. Say hello today.

Useful links and references

Image Attribution: “CONTRACTS” by KASIA BOJANOWSKA is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.


Jeffrey Effendi

Founder & Chief of Innovation, DrawHistory


  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive regular updates on the latest insights, ideas, and discussions at the intersection of social change and creativity.